Who Wrote 2 Timothy?

Bible Facts

Jan 1

Quick Summary

The Second Letter to Timothy presents itself as written by the apostle Paul during imprisonment near the end of his life. Like 1 Timothy, the letter has been debated in modern scholarship due to differences in vocabulary, tone, and church context. Internal evidence, early church testimony, and a wide range of scholarly analysis show why 2 Timothy was received as Pauline from the earliest centuries and why many scholars continue to affirm Pauline authorship, while others suggest composition by a close associate preserving Paul’s final teaching.

Introduction

Second Timothy is the most personal of the Pastoral Epistles. The letter reads as a farewell, combining pastoral exhortation, personal reflection, and urgent instruction. Its emotional tone, references to suffering, and anticipation of death distinguish it from other New Testament letters.

Because of these features, the question of authorship is closely tied to how one understands Paul’s final years and the formation of early Christian leadership. Any serious discussion of authorship must consider the letter’s internal claims, its early reception, and the conclusions of modern scholarship.

(Collins, Introduction to the New Testament, pp. 360–363)

Internal Evidence from the Letter

Second Timothy opens by identifying Paul as its author: “Paul, an apostle of Christ Jesus by the will of God” (2 Timothy 1:1). The letter is addressed to Timothy, whom Paul repeatedly names as a trusted coworker and spiritual heir (2 Timothy 1:2; 2:1).

(Moo, The Pastoral Epistles, pp. 79–81)

The letter contains numerous personal references that situate it in a specific historical moment. Paul describes being imprisoned, abandoned by some coworkers, and supported by others (2 Timothy 1:15–18; 4:9–18). He speaks of his impending death using sacrificial imagery, describing his life as already being poured out (2 Timothy 4:6–8).

These details align with the portrayal of Paul as a suffering apostle and suggest composition during a later imprisonment than the one described at the end of Acts.

(Towner, The Letters to Timothy and Titus, pp. 142–146)

Second Timothy also includes explicit references to named individuals and locations, such as Demas, Luke, Mark, Tychicus, and Troas (2 Timothy 4:10–13). The specificity of these references weighs against a generalized or purely fictional composition.

(Moo, Pastoral Epistles, pp. 96–99)

Early Church Testimony

Early Christian writers consistently attributed 2 Timothy to Paul.

The letter appears in the Muratorian Fragment as part of the Pauline corpus, indicating its acceptance as apostolic Scripture in the second century.

(Muratorian Fragment, lines 59–63)

Irenaeus cites 2 Timothy as Pauline when discussing the preservation of apostolic teaching (Against Heresies 3.3.4), treating the letter as authoritative instruction from Paul.

(Irenaeus, Against Heresies 3.3.4)

Tertullian refers to 2 Timothy as written by Paul in discussions of perseverance and suffering (Scorpiace 13).

(Tertullian, Scorpiace 13)

Eusebius includes 2 Timothy among Paul’s universally recognized letters, indicating continuous acceptance across the early church.

(Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History 3.3.5)

Modern Scholarly Discussion

Modern debate over 2 Timothy focuses on language, style, and historical setting. Critics note vocabulary differences from Paul’s undisputed letters and argue that the church structures reflected in the letter suggest a later period.

(Collins, Introduction to the New Testament, pp. 363–367)

Other scholars argue that these concerns do not outweigh the letter’s strong internal coherence and early reception. Douglas Moo emphasizes that personal details, emotional tone, and the absence of developed ecclesial bureaucracy point toward authentic Pauline authorship.

(Moo, Pastoral Epistles, pp. 100–104)

Philip Towner offers a mediating position, suggesting that while the letter reflects Pauline authority and memory, it may have been shaped by a close associate preserving Paul’s final exhortations. Even so, Towner affirms that the letter faithfully transmits Pauline theology and pastoral concern.

(Towner, Timothy and Titus, pp. 155–160)

Inspiration and Final Testimony

Second Timothy highlights how inspiration can function through farewell instruction and remembered teaching. Whether written directly by Paul or shaped by a close associate under his authority, the letter bears witness to apostolic faithfulness in the face of suffering and death.

The church’s recognition of 2 Timothy as Scripture reflects its consistent alignment with the apostolic gospel rather than dependence on simplistic models of authorship.

(Wright, Paul and the Faithfulness of God, pp. 520–524)

Conclusion

Second Timothy presents itself as Paul’s final letter, written from imprisonment and marked by urgency and personal concern. Internal evidence, early church testimony, and substantial scholarly analysis support its place within the Pauline tradition.

While modern scholars differ on the mechanics of its composition, the letter stands as a powerful testament to apostolic perseverance, faithful teaching, and hope rooted in Christ.

FAQ